Skip to main content

New MS Science Evaluations from EdReports!



View reports and compare materials
We just released new reviews of Certified Versions of OpenSciEd from Activate Learning and Kendall Hunt. Learn more and share with your colleagues!
​​​​
Title: Activate Learning Certified Version of OpenSciEd

Copyright Year: 2023

Publisher: Activate Learning

Grades:  6–8

Alignment: Meets Expectations

Usability: Meets Expectations
   
Title: Kendall Hunt Certified Version of OpenSciEd

Copyright Year: 2022

Publisher: Kendall Hunt

Grades: 6–8

Alignment: Meets Expectations

Usability: Meets Expectations

 
These reports would never have been possible without the dedication and countless hours of work from our educator reviewers. Thank you #edreportsnetwork!

Learn more about our review process and explore our interactive feature to find out why materials matter.
FOLLOW US TO STAY CONNECTED:
 
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
blank
blank
blank
Copyright © 2024, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:

EdReports.org
P.O. Box 51099
Durham, North Carolina 27717
 
unsubscribe from all emails   update subscription preferences 

Popular posts from this blog

OSPI Bulletin 065-23: Learning Standards Review Update

Summary:  This bulletin provides an update to the information about the learning standards review project addressed by Superintendent Reykdal’s letter to district superintendents dated February 14, 2023. It includes current information about the reviews of the Washington state learning standards for English/Language Arts, mathematics, and science. It also includes a timeline for the review process. Key Audiences:  Educational Service District Superintendents, School District Superintendents, School District Business Managers, School District Curriculum Directors OSPI's Bulletin re: Math, ELA, Science: [ PDF ] Science Updates: [ PDF ]
Read more

[STATE-LEVEL] ASSESSMENT SHOULD NOT DRIVE INSTRUCTION

Regional Science Coordinators are developing an online orientation class for the new Washington Comprehensive Assessment of Science (WCAS). We have involved OSPI’s Science Assessment lead, Dawn Cope and OSPI’s Director of K-12 Science, Ellen Ebert, in the process as well as Lois Sherwood from WSTA. In our first planning meeting, I wanted to hear the most important message from each person at the [virtual] table. Dawn Cope of the assessment department was the first to speak up and quite pointedly said, “assessment does not drive instruction.” That pretty much spoke for the rest of us. What does that mean for teachers in Washington State where we’ve spend the last 13 years writing “powerful classroom assessments” that mirrored the content and format of the WASL and the MSP? Assessment systems serve specific purposes . They are developed to provide specific kinds of data for those purposes. And an assessment developed at the state level to inform state-wide decisions does not l...
Read more

Three-Dimensional Nature of the new Washington Comprehensive Assessment of Science (WCAS)

The new science assessment does NOT privilege content above practice or crosscutting concepts. We have heard from two different parts of the region that someone who self-identifies as an NGSS-assessment-item-writer has returned to their district and erroneously reported to supervisors and colleagues that the new NGSS-aligned assessment’s (WCAS) items focus solely on one of the three dimension of NGSS (namely, the Disciplinary Core Ideas, most closely related to our previous notions of “content”). This is idea represents a serious misunderstanding that could derail a district’s transition efforts around NGSS. Not being an item-writer myself, I reached out to OSPI. Dawn Cope of OSPI’s Science Assessment Team responded with wonder that anyone could come away from item writing with that idea and, explained that all the training materials and the process used reflect the 3-dimensional nature of the NGSS. She shared all the training items for me to examine so I could try and see wher...
Read more