Skip to main content

DNA Essay Contest

Question: Did you know that the 2020 DNA Day Essay Contest (https://www.ashg.org/education/dnaday.shtml) question is live? This contest is open to students in grades 9-12 worldwide and asks students to examine, question, and reflect on important concepts in genetics.

This year, we're asking students about ancestry testing:
Ancestry testing is a form of direct-to-consumer genetic testing designed to inform customers about their genetic ancestry. There are generally three types of ancestry testing: Y chromosome testing, mitochondrial DNA testing, and autosomal DNA testing. If a person did all three ancestry tests, what types of information could they learn about their genetic ancestry and how does this genetic ancestry information compare and contrast with their cultural heritage (family traditions, etc.)?.
Students can win up to $1,000 with a matching $1,000 lab equipment grant for their qualifying teacher! We will award 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place winners, as well as 10 honorable mentions. Please consider sharing this exciting opportunity with your colleagues in the language arts, as well as in the sciences. It is an excellent way to implement "writing across the curriculum!"

The DNA Day website lists the 2020 contest rules, rubric, and deadlines. The essay submission site will open in early January, with submissions due Wednesday, March 4, at 5:00 pm U.S. Eastern Time. We hope you and your colleagues can build this essay into your teaching plans and look forward to reading your students' insightful essays.

Want more information about human genetics? Use the Genetics Engagement & Education Network (https://www.ashg.org/education/gene-network.shtml) to organize a classroom talk, plan a field trip, ask about career or academic advice, or almost any other human-genetics related query you may have. The Network is made up of ASHG members who have volunteered their time to be a resource and answer your questions at no cost to you.

Good luck!

Popular posts from this blog

OSPI Bulletin 065-23: Learning Standards Review Update

Summary:  This bulletin provides an update to the information about the learning standards review project addressed by Superintendent Reykdal’s letter to district superintendents dated February 14, 2023. It includes current information about the reviews of the Washington state learning standards for English/Language Arts, mathematics, and science. It also includes a timeline for the review process. Key Audiences:  Educational Service District Superintendents, School District Superintendents, School District Business Managers, School District Curriculum Directors OSPI's Bulletin re: Math, ELA, Science: [ PDF ] Science Updates: [ PDF ]

[STATE-LEVEL] ASSESSMENT SHOULD NOT DRIVE INSTRUCTION

Regional Science Coordinators are developing an online orientation class for the new Washington Comprehensive Assessment of Science (WCAS). We have involved OSPI’s Science Assessment lead, Dawn Cope and OSPI’s Director of K-12 Science, Ellen Ebert, in the process as well as Lois Sherwood from WSTA. In our first planning meeting, I wanted to hear the most important message from each person at the [virtual] table. Dawn Cope of the assessment department was the first to speak up and quite pointedly said, “assessment does not drive instruction.” That pretty much spoke for the rest of us. What does that mean for teachers in Washington State where we’ve spend the last 13 years writing “powerful classroom assessments” that mirrored the content and format of the WASL and the MSP? Assessment systems serve specific purposes . They are developed to provide specific kinds of data for those purposes. And an assessment developed at the state level to inform state-wide decisions does not l...

Three-Dimensional Nature of the new Washington Comprehensive Assessment of Science (WCAS)

The new science assessment does NOT privilege content above practice or crosscutting concepts. We have heard from two different parts of the region that someone who self-identifies as an NGSS-assessment-item-writer has returned to their district and erroneously reported to supervisors and colleagues that the new NGSS-aligned assessment’s (WCAS) items focus solely on one of the three dimension of NGSS (namely, the Disciplinary Core Ideas, most closely related to our previous notions of “content”). This is idea represents a serious misunderstanding that could derail a district’s transition efforts around NGSS. Not being an item-writer myself, I reached out to OSPI. Dawn Cope of OSPI’s Science Assessment Team responded with wonder that anyone could come away from item writing with that idea and, explained that all the training materials and the process used reflect the 3-dimensional nature of the NGSS. She shared all the training items for me to examine so I could try and see wher...